Technical Specifications
Basic Configuration
| Parameter | Details |
|---|---|
| Chemistry | Lithium Iron Phosphate (LiFePO₄) |
| Cell Configuration | 12 cells in series (3.2V nominal per cell, 12×3.2V = 36V) |
| Nominal Voltage | 36V |
| Capacity | 50AH |
| Total Energy | 36V × 50AH = 1.8kWh |
Charging & Discharging Characteristics
| Parameter | Details |
|---|---|
| Charging Voltage | 43.8V (3.65V per cell, 12×3.65V = 43.8V) |
| Standard Charge Current | 20A (0.4C rate, 2.5 hours for full charge) |
| Max Charge Current | 25A (0.5C rate, 2 hours for full charge) |
| Continuous Discharge Current | 50–100A |
| Peak Discharge Current | Up to 200A (4C rate, short-term) |
| Discharge Cutoff Voltage | 30V (2.5V per cell) |
Performance Parameters
| Parameter | Details |
|---|---|
| Cycle Life | ≥4,000 cycles (80% DOD) |
| Discharge Temp | -20°C to 60°C |
| Charge Temp | 0°C to 55°C |
| Storage Temp | -20°C to 60°C |
| Weight | 26 kg (60–70% lighter than lead-acid) |
| Dimensions | 420*250*180mm (manufacturer-dependent) |
| BMS Features | Cell balancing, overcharge/overcurrent protection, thermal management, CAN bus |
Product Detail

Features
● Long Cycle Life: 10 times longer cycle life time than lead acid battery.
● Higher Energy density: the energy density of lithium battery pack is 110wh-150wh/kg,
and the lead acid is 40wh-70wh/kg,so the weight of lithium battery is only 1/2-1/3 of
lead acid battery if the same energy.
● Higher Power Rate: 0.5c-1c continues discharge rate and 2c-5c peak discharge rate ,
give much more powerful output current.
● Wider Temperature Range: -20℃~60℃
● Superior Safety: Use more safer lifepo4 cells,and higher quality BMS,make full
protection of the battery
pack.
Overvoltage protection
Overcurrent protection
Short circuit protection
Overcharge protection
Over discharge protection
Reverse connection protection
Overheating protection
Overload protection


Advantages of Dking Power


Parameters of Golf cart batteries













—
36V (12S) 50Ah Golf Cart LiFePO₄ Battery: Technical, Market Analysis, Lead-Acid Comparisons, and Key Insights
I. Technical Specifications
Basic Configuration
| Parameter | Details |
|---|---|
| Chemistry | Lithium Iron Phosphate (LiFePO₄) |
| Cell Configuration | 12 cells in series (3.2V nominal per cell, 12×3.2V = 36V) |
| Nominal Voltage | 36V |
| Capacity | 50AH |
| Total Energy | 36V × 50AH = 1.8kWh |
Charging & Discharging Characteristics
| Parameter | Details |
|---|---|
| Charging Voltage | 43.8V (3.65V per cell, 12×3.65V = 43.8V) |
| Standard Charge Current | 20A (0.4C rate, 2.5 hours for full charge) |
| Max Charge Current | 25A (0.5C rate, 2 hours for full charge) |
| Continuous Discharge Current | 50–100A |
| Peak Discharge Current | Up to 200A (4C rate, short-term) |
| Discharge Cutoff Voltage | 30V (2.5V per cell) |
Performance Parameters
| Parameter | Details |
|---|---|
| Cycle Life | ≥4,000 cycles (80% DOD) |
| Discharge Temp | -20°C to 60°C |
| Charge Temp | 0°C to 55°C |
| Storage Temp | -20°C to 60°C |
| Weight | 26 kg (60–70% lighter than lead-acid) |
| Dimensions | 420*250*180mm (manufacturer-dependent) |
| BMS Features | Cell balancing, overcharge/overcurrent protection, thermal management, CAN bus |
II. Comparison with Lead-Acid Batteries
Performance Comparison
| Aspect | 36V 50Ah LiFePO₄ | 36V 50Ah Lead-Acid |
|---|---|---|
| Energy Density | 69 Wh/kg | 30–40 Wh/kg |
| Weight | ~26 kg | 45–50 kg |
| Cycle Life | ≥4,000 cycles | 300–500 cycles |
| Charging Efficiency | 90–95% | 70–80% |
| Self-Discharge Rate | <2%/month | 5–10%/month |
| Depth of Discharge (DOD) | 80% safe | 50% recommended |
| Voltage Stability | Stable during discharge | Significant voltage drop at low SOC |
Cost Comparison
| Aspect | LiFePO₄ | Lead-Acid |
|---|---|---|
| Initial Cost | Higher (advanced technology) | Lower (lower material cost) |
| Long-Term Cost | Lower (fewer replacements, low maintenance) | Higher (frequent replacements, high maintenance) |
Environmental Impact
| Aspect | LiFePO₄ | Lead-Acid |
|---|---|---|
| Toxicity | Non-toxic (no heavy metals) | Contains lead and sulfuric acid |
| Recycling | High recyclability, easy material recovery | Complex recycling, high pollution risk if mishandled |
III. Market Analysis
Market Size & Growth
- Current Status: The 36V 50Ah LiFePO₄ battery serves a niche but growing segment of the golf cart battery market, driven by demand from small golf courses, private resorts, and individual users.
- Growth Projection: Expected to grow at a CAGR of [X]% over the next 5 years, fueled by environmental regulations, performance upgrades, and cost reductions.
Market Drivers
| Factor | Impact |
|---|---|
| Environmental Policies | Restrictions on lead-acid batteries in eco-sensitive areas drive adoption of LiFePO₄. |
| Performance Demands | Long cycle life and fast charging meet reliability needs for small-scale operations. |
| Cost Reduction | Economies of scale lower LiFePO₄ prices, making it competitive for budget-conscious buyers. |
Challenges
- High Upfront Cost: Initial investment remains a barrier for price-sensitive markets.
- Low Awareness: Limited understanding of LiFePO₄’s long-term benefits slows adoption.
- Competition: From upgraded lead-acid batteries and alternative lithium chemistries (e.g., NCM).
IV. Compatible Golf Cart Voltage
- Small/Sport Models: Entry-level golf carts used in private estates, small courses, or short-distance transportation (e.g., 2–4 passenger carts).
- Vintage/Retrofit Vehicles: Older golf cart models originally designed for 36V lead-acid batteries, ideal for retrofitting with lithium for performance upgrades.
- Low-Power Applications: Carts used in flat-terrain environments (e.g., parks, campus shuttles) where high power is not required.
- Direct replacement for 36V lead-acid systems (no voltage conversion needed).
- Requires matching the physical dimensions of the original battery compartment.
- Suitable for motors rated up to 3–5 kW (common in lightweight golf carts).
V. Additional Analysis
Technical Trends
- Energy Density Improvements: Research into nano-structured LiFePO₄ materials aims to reach 180 Wh/kg, extending cart range.
- Ultra-Fast Charging: Targeting 80% charge in 30 minutes via advanced thermal management and high-conductivity electrolytes.
- Smart BMS Integration: IoT-enabled systems for real-time health monitoring, predictive maintenance, and fleet management.
Policy Impact
- Subsidies: Government incentives for eco-friendly batteries reduce upfront costs in regions like the EU and North America.
- Standards: Mandatory safety certifications (e.g., UN38.3, IEC 62133) ensure quality and recyclability.
Risks
- Raw Material Volatility: Dependence on lithium and iron prices; mitigated via recycling and alternative supply chains.
- Technological Disruption: Emerging solid-state batteries pose long-term replacement risks, necessitating continuous R&D investment.
Conclusion
Why Smart Battery Systems Revolutionize Golf Cart Performance
1. The Foundation of BMS Technology
- Cell Monitoring: Tracks voltage, temperature, and current across individual cells to ensure uniform performance .
- Safety Protection: Prevents overcharging, over-discharging, short circuits, and thermal runaway through hardware and software safeguards .
- Energy Optimization: Maximizes range by managing charge/discharge cycles and integrating with regenerative braking systems .
- Data Connectivity: Enables remote monitoring via Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, or IoT platforms for fleet management and diagnostics .
2. Core Advantages of Smart BMS in Golf Carts
2.1 Enhanced Battery Longevity
2.2 Optimized Energy Efficiency
- Regulating Charge Cycles: Fast-charging lithium batteries (e.g., 2–3 hours to 80% capacity) with 95% efficiency, compared to 8–12 hours for lead-acid .
- Dynamic Power Management: Adjusting power output based on terrain and usage patterns. For instance, Daly BMS’s collaborative braking module absorbs reverse high voltage during downhill braking, preventing power cuts and wheel lock .
- Regenerative Braking Integration: Recovering kinetic energy during braking to recharge the battery, increasing range by 10–15% .
2.3 Safety and Reliability
- Overcurrent Protection: Daly’s BMS handles 500A peak current with robust MOSFET packaging, ensuring stable performance under high loads .
- Thermal Management: Temperature sensors and cooling systems prevent overheating. For example, Lithium Balance’s c-BMS maintains ±0.1°C accuracy in extreme temperatures (-20°C to 60°C) .
- Fault Detection: Real-time alerts for 异常 voltage, current, or temperature deviations, enabling proactive maintenance .
2.4 Data-Driven Performance
- State of Charge (SoC) and Health (SoH): Accurate estimates of battery capacity and degradation, helping users plan charging and replacements .
- Historical Data Logging: Analyzing usage patterns to optimize energy consumption. For instance, Jiibms’ IoT BMS tracks charge/discharge cycles and energy efficiency to refine performance .
- Remote Diagnostics: Fleet managers can monitor multiple carts via cloud platforms, reducing downtime and maintenance costs .
3. Real-World Impact and Case Studies
3.1 Golf Course Transformations
- Hillside Haven Golf Club: After adopting BMS-equipped lithium batteries, the club reduced charging frequency by 50% and extended daily cart usage from 4 rounds to 6 rounds. The lightweight design also minimized turf damage by 20% .
- Thailand Golf Expo 2025: BSLBATT showcased lithium batteries with 40+ miles of range, leveraging BMS thermal management to handle extreme temperatures (-20°F to 120°F) .
3.2 User Testimonials
- Sarah’s Experience: Upgrading to an Ogrphy 36V lithium battery with BMS increased range from 18 miles to 30+ miles, with 1,000A peak current improving acceleration on slopes .
- Mark’s Feedback: A club operator using Vatrer Power’s 48V 105Ah battery noted zero maintenance and an 8-year warranty, eliminating lead-acid replacement hassles .
3.3 Industry Benchmarks
4. Cost-Benefit Analysis
- Reduced Maintenance: No watering, terminal cleaning, or acid disposal saves $200–$300 annually .
- Energy Savings: Faster charging and higher efficiency cut electricity bills by 15–20% .
- Extended Lifespan: Lithium batteries paired with BMS last 3–5 times longer than lead-acid, saving $2,000–$4,000 over a decade .
5. Future Trends and Innovations
5.1 AI and IoT Integration
5.2 Solid-State Batteries
5.3 Solar Integration
5.4 Modular Design
6. Challenges and Mitigation Strategies
6.1 Initial Cost Barrier
6.2 Compatibility Issues
6.3 Cold Weather Performance
7. Environmental Impact
- Reducing E-Waste: Lithium batteries are 100% recyclable, compared to lead-acid batteries, which pose toxic risks .
- Lower Carbon Footprint: Efficient energy management reduces grid reliance and greenhouse gas emissions. For example, a solar-integrated BMS can cut a golf course’s carbon footprint by 30% .















